Critiques
PreviousFeedback: Critiques, Demos, One on Ones, Presentations & Exhibition:NextIndividual "One on One" Meetings
Last updated
"It's better to be looked over than overlooked!" ~Mae West
Class and team critiques
Critiques (AKA crits) are the best way to articulate your ideas to others and get immediate feedback. During the crit, the professor and your classmates analyze and suggest ways to increase the aural, visual, and conceptual impact of each existing idea.
At its core a critique is simple:
What is working?
What is not working?
How can the project be improved?
Why are critiques important and useful? They help students to:
improve and move their projects forward.
get unstuck.
get exposed to other ideas and possibilities from others.
Rules of the critique (four are taken from by Don Miguel Ruiz):
Be present and engaged.
Give feedback to your classmates.
Do your best.
Do not make assumptions. Ask questions.
Critique the work, not the creator.
Do NOT take feedback personally. Remember critiques are about your work, not you. They are about making your work better.
Be impeccable with your word. Don’t just give a value judgment like “good” or “bad.” Give constructive feedback. Be specific and say why.
Think about the utility of your feedback. Positive feedback isn’t helpful or useful to the creator if it's only one descriptive word. What does "good" or "bad" actually mean? How can you use either to move your project forward? You can't. Specificity is key.
Have notes taken during the critique:
Review your crit notes and reflect upon what was said. Ask yourself how you could combine, transform, or expand the ideas that show the most promise. However, resist the temptation to incorporate all suggestions and comments. Only utilize the ones that work for you and your project.
Review your crit notes and reflect upon what was said.
Ask yourself how you could combine, transform, or expand the ideas that show the most promise.
However, resist the temptation to incorporate all suggestions and comments. Only utilize the ones that work for you and your project.
Offers a work-in-progress for review and feels prepared to question that work in a dialogue with other people.
Engages in dialogue with the creator with a commitment to the creator’s intent to make impactful work.
Initiates each step, keeps the process on track, and works to help the creator and critics use the process to frame useful questions and responses.
Critics state what was meaningful, evocative, interesting, exciting, and/or striking in the work they have just experienced.
What is working about the project?
The creator asks questions about the work. In answering, critics stay on topic with the question and may express opinions in direct response to the creator’s questions.
Critics ask neutral questions about the work, and the creator responds. Questions are neutral when they do not have an opinion couched in them.
This step is one of the most fundamental, challenging, and misunderstood steps of the Critical Response Process.
What is confusing or needs more clarification about the project?
Ask the creator about their philosophy or creative process.
Ask why the creator made a particular choice (tool, material, color, etc.)
Ask the creator how they did something.
Critics give feedback. (This deviates substantially from Liz Lerman's process.)
What are ways that the project can be improved?
What additional references, resources, projects, and/or links would be useful for the project?
How does the work make you feel?
Find something that personally resonates with you.
1 piece of encouraging feedback
1 critical comment
1 more encouraging piece of feedback
T – Tell the artist something you like.
A – Ask the artist a question.
G – Give the artist a suggestion.
Have at least a member(s) of your or another classmate take notes for you when your work is being critiqued and do not edit the responses, whether you agree with them or not.
What is the first thing you noticed about the work? What stands out to you? What appears to be the ?